Freedom World News

Horrors of HPV Vaccine exposed in Scientific Medical Paper Coverup

Horrors of HPV Vaccine exposed in Scientific Medical Paper Coverup

Horrors of HPV Vaccine exposed in Scientific Medical Paper Coverup
December 01
19:38 2016

Dangers of HPV Vaccine Revealed Yet Again in Scientific Paper that Was Retracted, Now Republished

By Waking Times Media

Posted on November 29, 2016

Christina Sarich, The Mind Unleashed

Waking Times Media

Recently a 43-page document produced by the Indian Parliament accused the U.S. organization, PATH, funded partially by the Bill and Melinda Gates’ foundation, of committing illegal and improper activities in support of the development of the HPV vaccine in India. Later, Gardasil and other HPV vaccine victims sued Merck, the manufacturer of those vaccines, for causing permanent disabilities. Though the dangers of these vaccines, sold under the auspices of protecting women from cervical cancer, are now more openly talked about, the industry did its best at covering up the possible dangers which makers knowingly swept under the rug. A newly published scientific document reveals some of these startling dangers, as never before, and calls into question the true intent behind these ‘medicines.’

It isn’t as if other scientist have not been ringing the alarm bells. Dr. Sin Hang Lee, MD, Director, Milford Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, recently submitted an official, open-letter complaint to the Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO), Dr. Margaret Chan, alleging gross misconduct, malfeasance and what potentially amounts to criminal behavior to deceive the public regarding the safety of HPV vaccines Gardasil and Cervarix.

The newly printed HPV vaccine study was one printed in the journal Vaccine, which had removed the study without any explanation, only telling the authors that the editor required further review of their paper. Later in the same month following contact with the paper’s writers, Vaccine retracted the paper, citing “serious concerns regarding the scientific soundness of the article,” and “seriously flawed” methodology.

However, In July, another journal — Immunologic Research — republished the paper.

The original paper cited behavioral abnormalities in young female mice after they were given aluminum adjuvants and the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, Gardasil. This lethal combination caused neuroinflammation and autoimmune reactions in the mice, leading to behavioral changes.

The new paper in Immunologic Research, “Behavioral abnormalities in female mice following administration of aluminum adjuvants and the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine Gardasil,” contains the same sentence in its abstract.

Furthermore, as Health Impact News details, in the new version of the study, the authors conclude:

…both Al and Gardasil vaccine injections resulted in behavioral abnormalities in mice…

How is it that one ‘scientific’ journal finds these results worthy of publishing, while another calls them into serious question. Could it be that  much of what is published is certifiably false, “hopelessly compromised” by the pharmaceutical industry and its financiers? Richard Horton, the once Editor-in Chief of one of the world’s most respected journals, The Lancet, states,

“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.”

Read More

The easiest way to create a website. Create your site at!

Related Articles


No Comments Yet!

There are no comments at the moment, do you want to add one?

Write a comment

Write a Comment